Indonesia’s Agrarian Governance Through IUS Integrum Nusantara 2045 Paradigm Based on The Quadruple Helix Model

https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v14i1.1956

Authors

  • Onny Medaline Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Ikhsan Lubis Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Nur Atheefa Sufeena M Suaree Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Keywords:

Digital Agrarian Governance, Ius Integrum Nusantara 2045, Quadruple Helix, Structural Agrarian Conflict

Abstract

Agrarian governance reform in Indonesia continues to confront persistent structural conflicts stemming from unequal land ownership, regulatory fragmentation, weak legal certainty, and the marginalization of indigenous peoples’ rights. In practice, the implementation of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) and its derivative regulations remains fraught with significant challenges. Among these, overlapping land claims constitute one of the most prominent and recurring sources of dispute in the land sector, hampering infrastructure development and undermining efforts to achieve equitable economic distribution across Indonesia. In addition, the shift in social orientation from communal value toward more individualistic land relations, the persistence of unclear land ownership status, and unequal distribution of land continue to exacerbate agrarian problems. Against this backdrop, this article analyses the concept of digital transformation in land administration through the Quadruple Helix model as a framework for fostering more inclusive national agrarian governance, particularly to address existing land conflicts. This research employs a juridical-normative method, integrating legal and conceptual approaches to examine agrarian governance reform in Indonesia. The analysis draws on primary legal materials, including laws and court decisions, as well as secondary sources such as academic articles and institutional reports, all of which were collected through desk-based research and systematic document analysis. This study applies qualitative analysis and normative legal reasoning to interpret legal norms and policy developments. Its analytical framework consists of three interrelated stages: problem mapping, diagnostic evaluation, and normative reconstruction. To ensure validity and rigor, triangulation of sources and methodologies is employed, aiming to formulate an integrative and adaptive agrarian governance model. The findings demonstrate that digital transformation in land administration hold strategic potential to reduce structural agrarian conflict through land data integration and increased transparency, accountability, and public engagement. However, the success of digitalization in minimizing agrarian conflict requires the integration of technological innovation, institutional reform, and inclusive community engagement. In this context, the Quadruple Helix model, encompassing government, academia, industry, and the community, proves to be a useful framework for aligning the interests of various actors and combining formal and local knowledge in agrarian governance. The Ius Integrum Nusantara 2045 paradigm offers a futuristic normative framework that positions agrarian law not merely as a regulatory instrument but as a means of justice, public morality, and the protection of socio-ecological values. The integration of this paradigm with the Quadruple Helix Model thus enables a form of agrarian law reform that is both adaptive to digital technology and responsive to legal pluralism and local wisdom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggono, Bayu Dwi, Rofi Wahanisa, Aulia Oktarizka Vivi Puspita Sari A.P., dan Septhian Eka Adiyatma. “Interrogating the Legal Foundations of Digital Transformation: Balancing Economic Growth and Social Welfare in the Era of Disruption.” Volksgeist: Journal of Law and Constitution 8, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i1.12211.

Ansell, C., dan A. Gash. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18, no. 4 (2008): 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.

Berawi, Mohammed Ali. “Innovative Digital Technology and Economy Capacity Development.” International Journal of Technology 13, no. 7 (2022): 1369–1372. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i7.6277.

Cai, Meina, Ilia Murtazashvili, and Jennifer Murtazashvili. “The Politics of Land Property Rights.” Journal of Institutional Economics 16, no. 2 (2020): 151–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137419000158.

Erwin, Yulias. “Environmental Law Enforcement in the Development of Tourism Sector in Kuta Mandalika Special Economic Region, Central Lombok.” IUS Journal of Law and Justice Studies 9, no. 2 (2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i2.929.

Haryanto, Totok Dwinur. “Land Management Model in Indonesia Based on Law Number 5 of 1960.” Jurnal Wacana Hukum 8, no. 2 (2009). https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v8i2.312

Karianga, Hendra, dan Ahsan Yunus. “Overlapping for Land Ownership Rights: Alternative Dispute Resolution by Ombudsman.” Russian Law Journal 10, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v10i1.260

Kartiasih, Fitri, et al. “Inequalities of Indonesia’s Regional Digital Development and Its Association with Socioeconomic Characteristics: A Spatial and Multivariate Analysis.” Information Technology for Development 29, no. 2–3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2110556.

Kartono, S. A., dan B. R. Rakhmatullah. “Effectiveness of Land Registration Electronic Certificates of Government Assets.” UMPurwokerto Law Review 4, no. 2 (2024): 309–320. https://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/umplr/article/view/19569.

Lubis, Ikhsan. Reformulation of Land Law: Constitutionality, Justice, and Ulayat-National Integration. Bandung: Kent Media, 2025.

Lubis, Mira Ardilla, Muhammad Fajar Abdilla, dan Siti Sardiana Berutu. “Agrarian Reform and Its Impact on the Indonesian Economy in the Old Order and New Order Eras.” Historical Analysis 14, no. 2 (2024): 47–52. https://dx.doi.org/10.25077/jas.v14i2.125.

Muntaqo, Firman, Mashudi Mashudi, Alip Dian Pratama, Abdullah Rosikh Fil Ilmi, and Iza Rumesten. 2025. “The Transformation of Land Law in Indonesia: From Commodification to Maqāṣid and Social Justice”. Al-Ahkam 35 (2):287-312. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2025.35.2.25605.

Ni Kadek Wina Surya Adiyanti, and Ida Bagus Anggapurana Pidada. 2024. “Peran Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Penerbitan Sertifikat Tanah Elektronik ”. Student Research Journal 2 (4):382-96. https://doi.org/10.55606/srjyappi.v2i4.1421.

Puri, Wulan Puspita, Ni Luh Gede Maytha Puspa Dewi, dan Widya Kartika. “Transformation of Ulayat Land Administration: Collaborative Governance Perspective in West Sumatra.” Journal of Public Policy 10, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v10i1.8543.

Rochwulaningsih, Yety, Singgih Tri Sulistiyono, Noor Naelil Masruroh, dan Nazala Noor Maulany. “Marine Policy Basis of Indonesia as a Maritime State: The Importance of Integrated Economy.” Marine Policy 108 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103639

Ruhaeni, Neni; Aqimuddin, Eka An; and Afriyadi, Hadian (2022) “MORALITAS PUBLIK SEBAGAI DASAR PEMBENAR TERHADAP KEWAJIBAN SERTIFIKASI HALAL PRODUK MAKANAN DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN GATT-WTO 1994,” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan: Vol. 52: No. 1, Article 6. DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol52.no1.3326.

Sahlan, Nurul Miqat, and Susi Susilawati. 2024. “Realizing ‘Deconstructional’ Justice Through Agrarian Civil Law Reform: A Review Of Jacques Derrida’s Theory”. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 12 (3):588-606. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i3.1559.

Serpin, Pelin. 2019. “The Public Morals Exception After the WTO Seal Products Dispute: Has the Exception Swallowed the Rules?”. Columbia Business Law Review 2016 (1):217-51. https://doi.org/10.7916/cblr.v2016i1.1736.

Suwitra, I Made. 2014. “LAND POSSESSION RIGHTS AND ITS AFFAIR”. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 2 (3). https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v2i6.180.

Published

2026-04-18

How to Cite

Medaline, O., Lubis, I., & M Suaree, A. S. (2026). Indonesia’s Agrarian Governance Through IUS Integrum Nusantara 2045 Paradigm Based on The Quadruple Helix Model . Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 14(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v14i1.1956