Reconfiguring Indonesia’s Labor Law Framework to Address Protection Gaps in the Gig Economy Era Following the Constitutional Court’s Decision

https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v14i1.1756

Authors

  • Agusmidah Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Fithriatus Shalihah Faculty of Law, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • M Virsa Aka Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourn

Keywords:

Constitutional Court Decision No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023, Decent work, Gig Workers, Job Creation Law, Labor Law

Abstract

The Indonesian labor market is shifting toward greater flexibility, driven by a surge in layoffs in the post-Covid-19 period (2020-2024), limited employment opportunities in the manufacturing sector, the demographic bonus, and the rapid expansion of platform-based industries and digital commerce. This shift has contributed to the rise of the gig economy, which has yet to provide adequate job security and decent working conditions. This paper examines the growing employment uncertainty within the gig economy and discusses how the government can respond through fairer and more responsive regulations to support a decent standard of living and sustainable worker welfare. This study employs a normative legal research method with legislative and conceptual approaches, relying on secondary data in the form of primary materials and scholarly literature from reputable academic sources. The findings indicate the need to revise labor laws, as mandated by Constitutional Court Decision No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023, which calls for the prompt enactment of a new Labor Law capable of providing holistic protection. Lessons from several developed countries highlight the need for regulatory synchronization both vertically, between laws and their implementing regulations, and horizontally, between the Manpower Law and other related policies. Labor regulations should cover both formal and informal workers through a work-life balance approach for all, with the aim of promoting fairness, welfare, and sustainable decent work. Thus, the framework of labour protection needs to be recalibrated to include gig workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alyati, Wan Fariza, Wan Zakaria, and Jabal M. Buaben. “The Theory of Post-Industrial Society.” Akademika 91, no. 1 (2021): 139–149. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2021-9101-12.

Behrendt, Christina, Quynh Anh Nguyen, and Uma Rani. “Social Protection Systems and the Future of Work: Ensuring Social Security for Digital Platform Workers.” International Social Security Review 72, no. 3 (2019): 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12212.

Bieber, Friedemann, and Jakob Moggia. “Risk Shifts in the Gig Economy: The Normative Case for an Insurance Scheme against the Effects of Precarious Work.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 29, no. 3 (2021): 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12233.

Brazil. Decree-Law No. 5,452: Consolidation of Labor Laws.

Friedman, Gerald. “Workers without Employers: Shadow Corporations and the Rise of the Gig Economy.” Review of Keynesian Economics 2, no. 2 (2014): 171–188. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03.

Goldkind, Lauri, and John G. McNutt. “Vampires in the Technology Mist: The Sharing Economy, Employment and the Quest for Economic Justice and Fairness.” Ethics and Social Welfare (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2018.1512139.

Howell, Crist. “The Transformation of French Industrial Relations: Labor Representation and the State in a Post-Dirigiste Era.” Politics & Society 37, no. 2 (2009): 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209333993.

Indonesia. Presidential Decree No. 442 of 1974.

Jaelani, Abdul Kadir, et al. “Legal Protection of Employee Wage Rights in Bankrupt Companies.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 31, no. 2 (2023): 202–223. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.25874.

Keban, Yeremias T., Ari Hernawan, and Arif Novianto, eds. Menyoal Kerja Layak dan Adil dalam Ekonomi Gig di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: IGPA Press, 2021.

Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan. “Satu Data Ketenagakerjaan.” Accessed 2024–2025.

https://satudata.kemnaker.go.id/data/kumpulan-data/55, https://satudata.kemnaker.go.id/data/kumpulan-data/954

https://satudata.kemnaker.go.id/data/kumpulan-data/1224

Kumparan. “Daftar Pabrik Tekstil yang Tutup per September 2024.” Accessed November 4, 2024.

https://kumparan.com/kumparanbisnis/daftar-pabrik-tekstil-yang-tutup-per-september-2024-ada-14-ribu-buruh-kena-phk-23d7pYEqAFI/full

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023. 31 October 2024.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. 25 November 2021.

Mattijssen, Lucille, Dimitris Pavlopoulos, and Wendy Smits. “Occupations and the Non-Standard Employment Career.” Work, Employment and Society 34, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020902984.

Mexico. Federal Labor Law. Published in the Official Gazette of the Federation, April 1, 1970.

Mutia, Fitri. Masyarakat Post-Industri dalam Pemikiran Daniel Bell. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2021.

Priyanka, Ellyaty, and Sir Handayani Nasution. Gig Economy dan Potensinya untuk Pemberdayaan Perempuan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Center for Digital Society, 2020.

Rahman, Rofi Aulia, József Hajdú, and Valentino Nathanael Prabowo. “Digital Labour Platformer’s Legal Status.” Volksgeist 7, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10366.

Ravenelle, Alexandrea J., Ken Cai Kowalski, and Erica Janko. “The Side Hustle Safety Net.” Sociological Perspectives 64, no. 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214211005489.

Setiawan, Sakina Rakhma Diah. “Tahun 2025 Nilai Ekonomi Digital Indonesia.” Accessed 2025.

https://money.kompas.com

SMERU Research Institute. “Melindungi Pekerja Ekonomi Gig.” Accessed October 24, 2024. https://smeru.or.id

South Africa. Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA), 2024.

Statista. “Gig Economy in South Korea.”https://www.statista.com/topics/10056/gig-economy-in-south-korea/

Tempo. “58 Perusahaan Tekstil Kolaps sejak 2022.” Accessed January 2025. https://www.tempo.co

Vallas, Steven P. “Rethinking Post-Fordism: The Meaning of Workplace Flexibility.” Sociological Theory 17, no. 1 (1999): 68–101.

Webster, Natasha A., and Qian Zhang. “Intersectional Understandings of Platform-Mediated Work.” Digital Geography and Society 3 (2022): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100025.

Wikipedia. “Dirigisme.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirigisme

Zorec, Iza, Jan Hočevar, and Luka Eržen. “Work Overload and Time Management.” Dynamic Relationships Management Journal 10, no. 2 (2021): 47–65. https://doi.org/10.17708/DRMJ.2021.v10n02a04

Zulfani, Nisa. “Gig Economy: Untung atau Rugi?” Accessed March 2025.

https://sites.unnes.ac.id/kimefe/2024/07/gig-economy-untung-atau-rugi/

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Agusmidah, Shalihah, F., & Aka, M. V. (2026). Reconfiguring Indonesia’s Labor Law Framework to Address Protection Gaps in the Gig Economy Era Following the Constitutional Court’s Decision. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v14i1.1756